Lang, John Temple (2011) Three Possibilities for Reform of the Procedure of the European Commission in Competition Cases under Regulation 1/2003. CEPS Special Report, 18 November 2011. UNSPECIFIED.
| PDF - Published Version Download (1269Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Following an examination of the present procedures of the European Commission in competition cases under Regulation 1/2003, this paper finds that the existing safeguards for due process are not sufficient and explains why reform is urgently needed. Three possible radical solutions are outlined: 1) setting up a decision-making body within the Commission, 2) setting up a separate European competition authority and 3) making the Commission a “prosecutor” bringing competition cases before the General Court, which would adopt the first legally binding decisions.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Other |
---|---|
Subjects for non-EU documents: | EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > competition policy EU policies and themes > EU institutions & developments > European Commission |
Subjects for EU documents: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Series and Periodicals: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Annual Reports: | UNSPECIFIED |
Series: | Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > CEPS Special Reports |
Depositing User: | Phil Wilkin |
Official EU Document: | No |
Language: | English |
Date Deposited: | 20 Nov 2011 13:06 |
Number of Pages: | 40 |
Last Modified: | 20 Nov 2011 13:06 |
URI: | http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/32989 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |