Link to the University of Pittsburgh
Link to the University Library SystemContact us link
AEI Banner

Total assets versus risk weighted assets: does it matter for Mrel? Bruegel Policy Contribution Issue 2016/12

Berger, Bennet and Hüttl, Pia and Merler, Silvia (2016) Total assets versus risk weighted assets: does it matter for Mrel? Bruegel Policy Contribution Issue 2016/12. [Policy Paper]

[img] PDF - Updated Version
Download (173Kb)

    Abstract

    Highlights • The European Union’s Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive foresees a ‘minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities’ (known as MREL) that banks need to comply with in order to ensure the effectiveness of the bail-in tool. The details of how MREL should be constructed in practice are under discussion. • We look at alternative ways to compute MREL, showing how the choice of the benchmark metric (risk weighted assets, total assets or leverage exposure) can change the allocation of requirements across banks. We also review MREL in light of the global effort to ensure future resolvability of banks, highlighting some differences with, and inconsistencies in relation to, the Financial Stability Board’s total loss-absorption capacity (TLAC).

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:
    Item Type: Policy Paper
    Subjects for non-EU documents: EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > economic and financial affairs > banks/financial markets
    Subjects for EU documents: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Series and Periodicals: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Annual Reports: UNSPECIFIED
    Series: Series > Bruegel (Brussels) > Policy Contributions
    Depositing User: Phil Wilkin
    Official EU Document: No
    Language: English
    Date Deposited: 27 Sep 2016 11:30
    Number of Pages: 12
    Last Modified: 27 Sep 2016 11:30
    URI: http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/80021

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads