Marinho, Clotilde and Heinonen, Matti (1998) Dublin after Schengen: Allocating Responsibility for Examining Asylum Applications in Practice. EIPASCOPE, 1998 (3). pp. 1-12.
| PDF Download (66Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
The objective of this article is to outline the main aims and features of the Dublin Convention and to briefly compare them with the Schengen provisions on asylum. Secondly, it will report on the experiences of the Convention’s first year of implementation: the problems and limitations of the Convention as well as relevant lessons drawn from the practical application of Schengen. Thirdly, it will confront the aims with the results so far and it will comment on necessary future developments.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects for non-EU documents: | EU policies and themes > Treaty reform > European Convention EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > Third Pillar/JHA/PJCC/AFSJ > asylum policy EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > Third Pillar/JHA/PJCC/AFSJ > Schengen/Prum/border control/freedom to travel |
Subjects for EU documents: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Series and Periodicals: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Annual Reports: | UNSPECIFIED |
Series: | Journals > European Institute of Public Administration (Maastricht) > EIPASCOPE |
Depositing User: | Phil Wilkin |
Official EU Document: | No |
Language: | English |
Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2003 |
Page Range: | pp. 1-12 |
Last Modified: | 15 Feb 2011 17:16 |
URI: | http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/800 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |