Emerson, Michael (2014) The Dano case – Or time for the UK to digest realities about the balance of competences between the EU and national levels. CEPS Commentary, 14 November 2014. [Policy Paper]
| PDF - Published Version Download (456Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
The European Court of Justice's new judgment on the Dano case should be reverberating around the UK. In Michael Emerson's view, it shows how national competences can be deftly used to control for 'benefit tourism' without challenging EU law, and that the Court is not acting as the agent of 'EU competence creep', as alleged in the Eurosceptic's stereotype.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Policy Paper |
---|---|
Subjects for non-EU documents: | EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > law & legal affairs-general (includes international law) > compliance/national implementation |
Subjects for EU documents: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Series and Periodicals: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Annual Reports: | UNSPECIFIED |
Series: | Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > CEPS Commentaries |
Depositing User: | Phil Wilkin |
Official EU Document: | No |
Language: | Bulgarian |
Date Deposited: | 14 Nov 2014 09:09 |
Number of Pages: | 2 |
Last Modified: | 14 Nov 2014 09:09 |
URI: | http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/57379 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |