Gros, Daniel. (2012) Banking Union: Ireland vs. Nevada, an illustration of the importance of an integrated banking system. CEPS Commentary, 18 October 2012. [Policy Paper]
| PDF - Published Version Download (415Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Despite their surprising similarities – in size and their housing booms – Ireland and the American state of Nevada sharply parted company when it came to who bore responsibility for bailing out their failed banks when the booms turned to bust. This latest Commentary by Daniel Gros vividly illustrates the importance of that difference and thus the shock-absorbing capacity of an integrated banking system and a banking union.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Policy Paper |
---|---|
Subjects for non-EU documents: | Countries > Ireland EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > economic and financial affairs > Single Market > capital, goods, services, workers EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > economic and financial affairs > financial crisis 2008-on/reforms/economic governance |
Subjects for EU documents: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Series and Periodicals: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Annual Reports: | UNSPECIFIED |
Series: | Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > CEPS Commentaries |
Depositing User: | Phil Wilkin |
Official EU Document: | No |
Language: | English |
Date Deposited: | 21 Oct 2012 21:38 |
Number of Pages: | 3 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2012 21:38 |
URI: | http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/37023 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |