Risse, Thomas (2009) Deliberations in negotiations. In: UNSPECIFIED.
| PDF - Published Version Download (209Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Arguments are all pervasive in negotiations; and yet, conventional negotiation theories often treat them as merely epiphenomenal to power and interests. The past decade, however, witnessed a growing interest in theories of deliberation and their application at the international level. This article takes stock of the state of the art. It argues that the “delibera-tive turn” has forced both rationalist and constructivist scholars to refine their arguments and reconsider their methodology. We argue that the new research frontier for constructivists is in assessing under which circumstances arguments affect negotiating actors‟ preferences, and subsequently lead to outcomes that are not easily explained in pure bargaining terms.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) |
---|---|
Subjects for non-EU documents: | Other > integration theory (see also researching and writing the EU in this section) EU policies and themes > EU institutions & developments > institutional development/policy > general |
Subjects for EU documents: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Series and Periodicals: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Annual Reports: | UNSPECIFIED |
Conference: | European Union Studies Association (EUSA) > Biennial Conference > 2009 (11th), April 23-25, 2009 |
Depositing User: | Phil Wilkin |
Official EU Document: | No |
Language: | English |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jan 2013 18:21 |
Number of Pages: | 23 |
Last Modified: | 08 Jan 2013 18:21 |
URI: | http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/33125 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |