Schneider, Gerald. (1997) "Choosing chameleons: National interests and the logic of coalition building in the Commission of the European Union". In: UNSPECIFIED, Seattle, WA. (Unpublished)
| PDF Download (1101Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
To the dismay of their own governments, newly appointed members of the Commission often change colour and become more integrationist than initially expected. Sociological integration theories assume that the experience in Brussels induces EU commissioners to adopt a pro-European policy in the long run. In this article, I reexamine this claim by systematically analyzing the appointment process and the politics of coalition building within the European Commission. A portfolio allocation model shows the conditions under which commissioners opt for more integration in order to increase their internal influence despite conflicting interests of their member states.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Coalition building; sociological integration theory. |
Subjects for non-EU documents: | EU policies and themes > EU institutions & developments > European Commission EU policies and themes > EU institutions & developments > institutional development/policy > decision making/policy-making Other > integration theory (see also researching and writing the EU in this section) |
Subjects for EU documents: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Series and Periodicals: | UNSPECIFIED |
EU Annual Reports: | UNSPECIFIED |
Conference: | European Union Studies Association (EUSA) > Biennial Conference > 1997 (5th), May 29-June 1, 1997 |
Depositing User: | Phil Wilkin |
Official EU Document: | No |
Language: | English |
Date Deposited: | 15 Mar 2007 |
Page Range: | p. 17 |
Last Modified: | 15 Feb 2011 17:23 |
URI: | http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2721 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |