Link to the University of Pittsburgh
Link to the University Library SystemContact us link
AEI Banner

Legislating amidst public controversy: the Services Directive. Egmont Paper No. 32, October 2009

Timmerman, Peter. (2009) Legislating amidst public controversy: the Services Directive. Egmont Paper No. 32, October 2009. [Policy Paper]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (393Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    Introduction. The adoption of the Services Directive in 2006 constituted the final act of one of the most controversial pieces of European legislation adopted in recent years. The highly ambitious proposal quickly met resistance in the public opinion, since the proposal was feared to clear the way for social dumping and was believed to lead to a race to the bottom regarding worker’s rights. The ‘Bolkestein Directive’, named after the Commissioner for Internal Market who launched the proposal, thus quickly became a highly controversial document. From the outset, its importance for the single market in services made the proposed directive a high profile issue. For the Barroso Commission, it was one of its principal dossiers, although it was initially put on the table by the Prodi Commission in the beginning of 2004. Charlie Mc Creevy, the new Commissioner for the Internal Market, found himself thus confronted with a highly controversial matter. Although he initially defended the proposal, the co-decision procedure forced him to give in to the fierce opposition of the European Parliament, which reflected the growing dislike in the public opinion. The controversy surrounding the directive is even believed to be one the reasons for the rejection of the European Constitution in the French and Dutch referenda in 2005. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the decision-making process the Services Directive has gone through. The first part contains a brief overview of the rationale behind the proposal (1), after which the situation of the internal market in services will be analysed (2). The next parts describe the Commission’s initial proposal (3), the way in which it was amended by the European Parliament (4), the modified Commission text (5) and its final adoption (6). The seventh part contains a critical appraisal of the Services Directive (7). Finally, the role of the Institutions is being looked at (8).

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:
    Item Type: Policy Paper
    Subjects for non-EU documents: EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > economic and financial affairs > Single Market > capital, goods, services, workers
    EU policies and themes > EU institutions & developments > institutional development/policy > decision making/policy-making
    Subjects for EU documents: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Series: UNSPECIFIED
    ["eprint_fieldname_eusries" not defined]: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Annual Reports: UNSPECIFIED
    Series: Series > Egmont : Royal Institute for International Affairs > Egmont Papers
    Depositing User: Phil Wilkin
    Official EU Document: No
    Language: English
    Date Deposited: 29 Oct 2009
    Page Range: p. 55
    Last Modified: 15 Feb 2011 18:17
    URI: http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11870

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads