Secondat, Charles (2016) To be binding or not to be binding? The delicious Cameron/Gove legal controversy about the EU–UK deal. Egmont Commentary, 9 March 2016. [Policy Paper]
![[img]](http://aei.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/other.png) | Other - Published Version Download (52Kb) |
Official URL: http://www.egmontinstitute.be/cameron-gove-legal-c...
Abstract
The Brexit debate promises to be conceptually delightful. Within days of the European Council agreement, the prime minister and the secretary of state for justice of the United Kingdom were already busily defending completely opposite visions of the EU–UK deal.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Policy Paper |
|---|---|
| Subjects for non-EU documents: | EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > Brexit Countries > U.K. |
| Subjects for EU documents: | UNSPECIFIED |
| EU Series and Periodicals: | UNSPECIFIED |
| EU Annual Reports: | UNSPECIFIED |
| Series: | Series > Egmont : Royal Institute for International Affairs > Commentaries |
| Depositing User: | Phil Wilkin |
| Official EU Document: | No |
| Language: | English |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Feb 2018 11:18 |
| Number of Pages: | 1 |
| Last Modified: | 05 Feb 2018 11:18 |
| URI: | http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/92896 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
![[feed]](/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}
