Link to the University of Pittsburgh
Link to the University Library SystemContact us link
AEI Banner

The EU Special Representatives: A dwindling but resilient resource at the service of EU Foreign and Security Policy. CEPS Policy Brief No. 348 September 2016

Fouéré, Erwan (2016) The EU Special Representatives: A dwindling but resilient resource at the service of EU Foreign and Security Policy. CEPS Policy Brief No. 348 September 2016. [Policy Paper]

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (2074Kb)

    Abstract

    Although reduced in number since the appointment of the first EU Special Representative twenty years ago, these senior diplomatic envoys continue to play a valuable role in the EU’s foreign and security policy. Yet the perception remains that they are appreciated more by the EU member states than by the EU institutional system where their status within the EEAS remains ambiguous. More needs to be done to ensure that they are effectively anchored in the EU institutional system and that maximum use is made of the added value they can bring to the EU foreign and security policy machinery. The High Representative/Vice President’s intention to terminate the ‘double-hatted’ model, while perceived as a logical consequence of the Lisbon Treaty, is causing tensions with the EU member states that remain to be convinced on the viability of this approach. There is a danger that if not properly managed, it could undermine the element of continuity in the work undertaken by the EUSRs in the countries concerned. The welcome focus in the EU Global Security Strategy on an enhanced role for the EU in peace-building will require a comprehensive action plan to ensure that both the EU delegations and the EUSRs, who are singled out in this context, have the resources and capacity to respond to this challenge. The EU’s commitment to supporting the role of civil society in conflict situations remains haphazard, with the failure to engage with civil society in the ongoing political crisis in Macedonia being a classic example of how it should not be done. Will the commitment contained in the EU Global Security Strategy, in relation to pre-emptive diplomacy and conflict resolution, to interact with civil society be more than just ‘window dressing’ and make a real difference on the ground?

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:
    Item Type: Policy Paper
    Subjects for non-EU documents: EU policies and themes > External relations > common foreign & security policy 1993--(includes CSDP)
    Subjects for EU documents: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Series and Periodicals: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Annual Reports: UNSPECIFIED
    Series: Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > CEPS Policy Briefs
    Depositing User: Phil Wilkin
    Official EU Document: No
    Language: English
    Date Deposited: 11 Oct 2016 10:56
    Number of Pages: 12
    Last Modified: 11 Oct 2016 10:56
    URI: http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/80162

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads