Should ratification proceed? An Assessment of Different Options after the Failed Referenda. CEPS Policy Briefs No. 75, 1 June 2005
(2005) Should ratification proceed? An Assessment of Different Options after the Failed Referenda. CEPS Policy Briefs No. 75, 1 June 2005.
Full text available as: |
Abstract
In the aftermath of the French and Dutch rejection of the Constitutional Treaty, EU policy-makers are scrambling to prevent further damage and to devise ways of salvaging what they feel are the essential elements of the draft treaty. Various options are being proposed as to the best way forward. Given the profound consequences that any decision taken now will have for the future of the EU, it is crucial that policy-makers have a clear idea of the alternative scenarios and the probability of finding a common agreement on them. This Policy Brief looks a little closer at the different options available and assesses their respective advantages and disadvantages.
| Item Type: | Policy Paper |
|---|---|
| Public Domain: | No |
| Refereed: | No |
| Status: | Published |
| Authors, Individual: | Kurpas, Sebastian. |
| Title: | Should ratification proceed? An Assessment of Different Options after the Failed Referenda. CEPS Policy Briefs No. 75, 1 June 2005 |
| Language: | English |
| Institution: | Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) |
| Journals and Series: | Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > CEPS Policy Briefs |
| Pages: | 4 |
| Month: | June |
| Year: | 2005 |
| Subjects: | EU policies and themes > Treaty reform > Constitution for Europe |
| Alternative Locations: | http://shop.ceps.be/BookDetail.php?item_id=1233 |
| ID Code: | 6618 |
| Deposited By: | Wilkin, Phil |
| Deposited On: | 15 April 2007 |




