Link to the University of Pittsburgh
Link to the University Library SystemContact us link
AEI Banner

Should ratification proceed? An Assessment of Different Options after the Failed Referenda. CEPS Policy Briefs No. 75, 1 June 2005

Kurpas, Sebastian. (2005) Should ratification proceed? An Assessment of Different Options after the Failed Referenda. CEPS Policy Briefs No. 75, 1 June 2005. [Policy Paper]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (60Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    In the aftermath of the French and Dutch rejection of the Constitutional Treaty, EU policy-makers are scrambling to prevent further damage and to devise ways of salvaging what they feel are the essential elements of the draft treaty. Various options are being proposed as to the best way forward. Given the profound consequences that any decision taken now will have for the future of the EU, it is crucial that policy-makers have a clear idea of the alternative scenarios and the probability of finding a common agreement on them. This Policy Brief looks a little closer at the different options available and assesses their respective advantages and disadvantages.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:
    Item Type: Policy Paper
    Subjects for non-EU documents: EU policies and themes > Treaty reform > Constitution for Europe
    Subjects for EU documents: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Series: UNSPECIFIED
    ["eprint_fieldname_eusries" not defined]: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Annual Reports: UNSPECIFIED
    Series: Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > CEPS Policy Briefs
    Depositing User: Phil Wilkin
    Official EU Document: No
    Language: English
    Date Deposited: 15 Apr 2007
    Page Range: p. 4
    Last Modified: 15 Feb 2011 17:43
    URI: http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/6618

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads