Link to the University of Pittsburgh
Link to the University Library SystemContact us link
AEI Banner

Oral Question (0-93/83) with debate pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure by Mr Fanti and Mr Piquet on behalf of the Communist and Allies Group to the Commission of the European Communities. Subject: Decisions to be taken on four subjects of the negotiations taken as a whole whereas the Stuttgart European Council has declared itself in favour of a genuine overall compromise with regard to the decisions to be taken on four subjects of negotiation taken as a whole (CAP, structural funds, financing of the Community and correction of imbalances, EMS and new policies), whereas the European Parliament has stated clearly that any proposal for the correction of financial imbalances in isolation from the other aspects is unacceptable, having regard to the undertakings repeatedly made by the Council that it will take into account the opinions expressed by the European Parliament on the above-mentioned topics and that it will involve Parliament itself; 1. What stage has the negotiation reached? 2. Have the above-mentioned criteria and undertakings been observed? 3. What Guarantee can the Commission give so as to avoid biased or unsatisfactory results, as occurred in the case of the mandate of 30 May 1980. Working Documents 1983-1984. Document 1-960/83. 26 October 1983

UNSPECIFIED (1983) Oral Question (0-93/83) with debate pursuant to Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure by Mr Fanti and Mr Piquet on behalf of the Communist and Allies Group to the Commission of the European Communities. Subject: Decisions to be taken on four subjects of the negotiations taken as a whole whereas the Stuttgart European Council has declared itself in favour of a genuine overall compromise with regard to the decisions to be taken on four subjects of negotiation taken as a whole (CAP, structural funds, financing of the Community and correction of imbalances, EMS and new policies), whereas the European Parliament has stated clearly that any proposal for the correction of financial imbalances in isolation from the other aspects is unacceptable, having regard to the undertakings repeatedly made by the Council that it will take into account the opinions expressed by the European Parliament on the above-mentioned topics and that it will involve Parliament itself; 1. What stage has the negotiation reached? 2. Have the above-mentioned criteria and undertakings been observed? 3. What Guarantee can the Commission give so as to avoid biased or unsatisfactory results, as occurred in the case of the mandate of 30 May 1980. Working Documents 1983-1984. Document 1-960/83. 26 October 1983. [EU European Parliament Document]

[img] PDF
Download (34Kb)
    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:
    Item Type: EU European Parliament Document
    Subjects for non-EU documents: UNSPECIFIED
    Subjects for EU documents: General policy and overall development
    EU Series and Periodicals: GENERAL:European Parliament Session Documents
    EU Annual Reports: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Document Number: EP Working Documents 1983-84 1-0960/83
    Depositing User: Phil Wilkin
    Official EU Document: Yes
    Language: English
    Date Deposited: 21 Mar 2015 15:48
    Number of Pages: 2
    Last Modified: 21 Mar 2015 15:48
    URI: http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/61189

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads