Link to the University of Pittsburgh
Link to the University Library SystemContact us link
AEI Banner

The Economics of Single Market Regulation. Bruges European Economic Policy Briefing 25/2012

Pelkmans, Jacques (2012) The Economics of Single Market Regulation. Bruges European Economic Policy Briefing 25/2012. [Policy Paper]

[img] PDF - Published Version
Download (1692Kb)

    Abstract

    In the vast domain of the internal market, ‘regulation’ is EU’s core business. Therefore, a good appreciation of European economic integration requires a sound analytical economic perspective of EU regulation. Since the Single European Act, economists have gradually improved the economic analysis of EU regulation. EU policy-makers began to accept cost/benefit analysis with the Maastricht treaty and nowadays the rigorous logic of Better Regulation and regulatory impact analysis has become routine in the EU circuit, although less with the EU legislator (EP and Council). The present BEEP Briefing provides an accessible survey of the state of the art of the evidence-based, economic approach to EU Single Market regulation. This approach puts the subsidiarity test, proportionality and necessity on a firmer analytical footing and offers a healthy discipline of the precautionary principle. The acceptance of economic, evidence-based regulatory logic has caused a change of mind-sets in the European Commission: EU regulation is now routinely discussed in terms of incentives, asymmetries of information, multiple policy options (instead of going for a single one only), market-based instruments, quantification of benefits and costs, red-tape alerts and cost-effectiveness. Last but not least, this also matters for national regulation. Given an ever deeper and wider internal market than two decades ago, not to speak of the Eurozone, the regulatory autonomy of Member States has to be balanced against the possible consequences of undermining or preventing the ‘proper functioning’ of the internal market. The key words here are pro-competitive reforms and ‘diversity’’, based on distinct national preferences, yet minimizing costly ‘regulatory heterogeneity’ arising from decentralized decision-making but without being rooted in genuine differences in preferences.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:
    Item Type: Policy Paper
    Uncontrolled Keywords: EU internal market, EU regulation, risk regulation, subsidiarity, proportionality, cost-benefit analysis, precautionary principle, regulatory acquis
    Subjects for non-EU documents: EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > economic and financial affairs > Single Market > general
    Subjects for EU documents: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Series and Periodicals: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Annual Reports: UNSPECIFIED
    Series: Series > College of Europe (Brugge) > Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings (BEEP)
    Depositing User: Phil Wilkin
    Official EU Document: No
    Language: English
    Date Deposited: 30 Oct 2017 15:14
    Number of Pages: 43
    Last Modified: 30 Oct 2017 15:14
    URI: http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/58459

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads