Link to the University of Pittsburgh
Link to the University Library SystemContact us link
AEI Banner

Transaction costs in the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP): Understanding the United States' impact on European security

Weiss, Moritz (2009) Transaction costs in the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP): Understanding the United States' impact on European security. In: UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)

PDF - Published Version
Download (410Kb) | Preview


    The objective of the paper is to introduce a comprehensive approach to the emergence of the European Union’s security and defence policy (ESDP) in 1998/9. In particular, the - direct and indirect - impact of the United States is the focus of the examinations. It is demonstrated that the prominently promoted Realist emphasis of structural power conditions, such as unipolarity and German reunification, is misleading. More importantly, the conceptual lenses of (soft) balancing against and bandwagoning with power cannot grasp the differentiated nature of ESDP and provide, therefore, a flawed approach. In contrast, the paper argues that liberal-institutionalist thought and ‘transaction costs economics’ offer a heuristically promising point of departure. More specifically, it focuses not only on uncertainty and the resulting risks of opportunism, but also on the specificity of those assets that the ESDP has ultimately created. Empirically, it is argued that Britain and France were increasingly confronted with high risks of opportunism within NATO to provide European security. The American commitment to all kinds of security problems had suffered credibility and, therefore, the medium powers had searched for another institutional option to perform this task on a long-term basis. While this assessment of ex post transaction costs triggered the initial establishment of ESDP, ex ante transaction costs were responsible for its more specific design. After all, the superpower and most influential NATO member would not stand aside to watch the creation of a competitor to the Alliance. Hence ESDP had to be compatible with NATO, which was assured by all participants and was subsequently incorporated into the EU's agreements. General, and thus redeployable, military assets represented the institutional solution to the conflict between European autonomy and NATO's primacy.

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:
    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
    Subjects for non-EU documents: EU policies and themes > External relations > common foreign & security policy 1993--European Global Strategy
    EU policies and themes > External relations > EU-US
    Subjects for EU documents: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Series and Periodicals: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Annual Reports: UNSPECIFIED
    Conference: European Union Studies Association (EUSA) > Biennial Conference > 2009 (11th), April 23-25, 2009
    Depositing User: Phil Wilkin
    Official EU Document: No
    Language: English
    Date Deposited: 12 May 2012 17:08
    Number of Pages: 39
    Last Modified: 12 May 2012 17:08

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads