Ghosh, Arunabha. (2010) Negotiating around tradeoffs: alternative institutional designs for climate finance. ECP Report No. 10, December 2010. [Working Paper]
![[img]](http://aei.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF Download (165Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
The primary question addressed in this paper is: How would different governance priorities affect the institutional arrangements for a credible financing mechanism in the climate regime? The paper argues that tradeoffs are inevitable in climate finance negotiations, so it is important to recognise them upfront and organise negotiations around the priorities that different sets of countries identify. Such a process would generate alternative institutional designs, each offering a different balance of voice in governance, scale of funding, and timely action.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Working Paper |
|---|---|
| Subjects for non-EU documents: | EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > environmental policy (including international arena) EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > budgets & financing |
| Subjects for EU documents: | UNSPECIFIED |
| EU Series: | UNSPECIFIED |
| EU Annual Reports: | UNSPECIFIED |
| Series: | Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > ECP Reports |
| Depositing User: | Phil Wilkin |
| Official EU Document: | No |
| Language: | English |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Jan 2011 |
| Page Range: | p. 22 |
| Last Modified: | 15 Feb 2011 18:40 |
| URI: | http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15446 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
![[feed]](/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}
