Link to the University of Pittsburgh
Link to the University Library SystemContact us link
AEI Banner

Administrative reforms in South Eastern European states. Comparative study in view of enlarging the European Administrative Space. 2010 Sino-US International Conference on Public Administration (5th), June 14-17, 2010, Xiamen City, P.R. China

Matei, Lucica and Matei, Ani (2010) Administrative reforms in South Eastern European states. Comparative study in view of enlarging the European Administrative Space. 2010 Sino-US International Conference on Public Administration (5th), June 14-17, 2010, Xiamen City, P.R. China. In: UNSPECIFIED.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (1607Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    The accession and enlargement of the European integration process have determined, especially in the last decade, profound reforms aimed at changing the national public administrations in consensus with the developments of the administrations in the European Union Member States. Framed in a more general international context defined by the public management reforms, even in developed countries, such as those of OECD, the administrative reforms in South-Eastern European states had recorded different dynamics, and the processes of administrative convergence have been marked by a broad diversity. In this context, the paper aims to achieve a comparative study concerning the general, strategic and operational framework of the reforms in states revealing different hypostases within the process of accession into the European Union. The target group of the analysis will comprise Balkan states (Romania, Bulgaria, Greece or Turkey), Western Balkan states (Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia or Montenegro) or states belonging to the former soviet block (Moldova, Ukraine or Belarus). Lacking an European model of public administration, the comparative study will use as comparison criteria, the principles of the European Administrative Space concerning administration by law, predictability of the public managerial processes, decisional transparency, efficiency and effectiveness. Criteria of administrative rationalization derived from public management reforms will be added. Therefore, the paper will be structured on several chapters, as follows: -Overview concerning the institutional framework of the administrative reforms; -Comparative analyses taking into consideration the above mentioned criteria; - Conclusions. The research methods refer to documentary and bibliographical analysis, and comparative systemic analysis

    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII (Chicago style) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:
    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Administrative reforms; comparative analysis; European Administrative Space.
    Subjects for non-EU documents: Countries > Ukraine
    Countries > Montenegro (June 2006-on)
    EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > public policy/public administration
    Countries > Romania
    Countries > Croatia
    Countries > Bulgaria
    Countries > Slovenia
    Countries > Belarus
    Countries > Turkey
    Countries > Moldova
    Countries > Macedonia
    Countries > Greece
    Subjects for EU documents: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Series: UNSPECIFIED
    ["eprint_fieldname_eusries" not defined]: UNSPECIFIED
    EU Annual Reports: UNSPECIFIED
    Depositing User: Ani Matei
    Official EU Document: No
    Language: English
    Date Deposited: 25 Nov 2010
    Page Range: pp. 1-28
    Last Modified: 15 Feb 2011 18:37
    URI: http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15022

    Available Versions of this Item

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads