Pitt Logoempty spaceULS LinkContact Link

The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. CEPS Policy Brief No. 180, 9 January 2009

Gnedina, Elena and Emerson, Michael. (2009) The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. CEPS Policy Brief No. 180, 9 January 2009 .

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

The January 2009 interruptions of gas supplies from Russia to the EU via Ukraine, following the earlier 2006 crisis, has confirmed the absolutely intolerable situation in which a commodity of strategic importance for European industry and households has become uncertain and erratic, in breach of long-term supply contracts, as a result of disorderly commercial and political relations between Russia and Ukraine. The recently agreed tri-partite (EU, Russia, Ukraine) monitoring system is a positive step, even if at the time of writing supplies have not yet resumed. But in any case this can be viewed as no more than a stop-gap measure. A more fundamental and permanent solution is required. For this purpose the authors propose that the EU, Russia and Ukraine negotiate the creation of a new business consortium to be granted a long-term concession to operate the Ukraine trunk gas transit pipeline.

Item Type:Other
Public Domain:No
Refereed:No
Status:Published
Authors, Individual:Gnedina, Elena and Emerson, Michael.
Title:The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. CEPS Policy Brief No. 180, 9 January 2009
Language:English
Journals and Series:Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > CEPS Policy Briefs
Pages:14
Month:January
Year:2009
Subjects:Countries > Russia
Countries > Ukraine
EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > energy policy
Alternative Locations:http://shop.ceps.eu/BookDetail.php?item_id=1782
ID Code:10766
Deposited By:Wilkin, Phil
Deposited On:23 April 2009