The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. CEPS Policy Brief No. 180, 9 January 2009
(2009) The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. CEPS Policy Brief No. 180, 9 January 2009 .
Full text available as: |
Abstract
The January 2009 interruptions of gas supplies from Russia to the EU via Ukraine, following the earlier 2006 crisis, has confirmed the absolutely intolerable situation in which a commodity of strategic importance for European industry and households has become uncertain and erratic, in breach of long-term supply contracts, as a result of disorderly commercial and political relations between Russia and Ukraine. The recently agreed tri-partite (EU, Russia, Ukraine) monitoring system is a positive step, even if at the time of writing supplies have not yet resumed. But in any case this can be viewed as no more than a stop-gap measure. A more fundamental and permanent solution is required. For this purpose the authors propose that the EU, Russia and Ukraine negotiate the creation of a new business consortium to be granted a long-term concession to operate the Ukraine trunk gas transit pipeline.
| Item Type: | Other |
|---|---|
| Public Domain: | No |
| Refereed: | No |
| Status: | Published |
| Authors, Individual: | Gnedina, Elena and Emerson, Michael. |
| Title: | The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. CEPS Policy Brief No. 180, 9 January 2009 |
| Language: | English |
| Journals and Series: | Series > Centre for European Policy Studies (Brussels) > CEPS Policy Briefs |
| Pages: | 14 |
| Month: | January |
| Year: | 2009 |
| Subjects: | Countries > Russia Countries > Ukraine EU policies and themes > Policies & related activities > energy policy |
| Alternative Locations: | http://shop.ceps.eu/BookDetail.php?item_id=1782 |
| ID Code: | 10766 |
| Deposited By: | Wilkin, Phil |
| Deposited On: | 23 April 2009 |




